NGF logo

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ngfrepository.org.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/999
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMark Abani-
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-20T11:45:49Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-20T11:45:49Z-
dc.date.issued2015-11-16-
dc.identifier.citationMark Abani (2015)International Case Studies of IGR Reform and Practical Measures for States’ considerationen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ngfrepository.org.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/999-
dc.description.abstractThough many countries in the world generate their revenue at national and local level, very few have the structure in Nigeria where there are three levels of collection and two levels of legislation. The closest to this structure is found in Brazil and India. A third is partially true in Canada. Similar Separation in powers In both Brazil and India there are laws that charge the Federal level with the primary collection of taxes and levies especially of international and interstate financial activities, while States have powers on concurrent legislation to both charge and collect a number of taxes and levies. In turn the States legislate for the collection of IGR at the Local levels.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectInternationalen_US
dc.subjectIGRen_US
dc.subjectReformsen_US
dc.subjectCase Studiesen_US
dc.subjectPracticalen_US
dc.subjectMeasuresen_US
dc.subjectStatesen_US
dc.titleINTERNATIONAL CASE STUDIES OF IGR REFORM AND PRACTICAL MEASURES FOR STATES’ CONSIDERATIONen_US
dc.typePresentationen_US
Appears in Collections:IGR 2015 NATIONAL PEER LEARNING EVENTS: PRESENTATION ON INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL EXPERIENCE

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
IGR International Case Study Presentation - Dr Mark Abani.pptxInternational Case Studies of IGR Reform and Practical Measures for States’ consideration476.14 kBMicrosoft Powerpoint XMLView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.