Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://ngfrepository.org.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1100Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | BudgiT | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-01T12:52:25Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2020-09-01T12:52:25Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | BudgiT (2019) State of States | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://ngfrepository.org.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1100 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | followed by Rivers, Akwa Ibom and Kano states. Access to audited statements brought out some facts on the true state of recurrent expenditure in focus states. We discovered states, such as Delta, running huge recurrent expenditure reaching N200bn. Bayelsa, despite its size and population, has a high recurrent bill as high as N137bn, compared with Ebonyi with a recurrent bill of N30bn, Sokoto (N38bn), Jigawa (N43bn), Yobe (N35bn), etc. It is a recurring theme to see states in South-South Nigeria running high recurrent bills, mainly driven by the high revenues earned due to the 13% derivation. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | BudgiT | en_US |
| dc.subject | Budget | en_US |
| dc.subject | State of States 2019 | en_US |
| dc.subject | Analysis | en_US |
| dc.subject | BudgiT | en_US |
| dc.title | STATE OF STATES 2019 | en_US |
| dc.type | Technical Report | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | BudgiT | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Budgit 2019-State-of-States.pdf | STATE OF STATE 2019. Budget Analysis | 8.8 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.